Emily Richards BAPP Blog

I initially thought the professional inquiry a difficult process to grasp, however after getting my head around that I thought the artefact would come quite naturally and would be easier to establish. However this was not the case! And I think I am right in thinking that a few of us in module three felt the same after discussing it within my SIG and in group Skype chats. I think being told that we shouldn't think about it until we have finished the inquiry and the critical review left most of us with the idea that the artefact is about the findings, however the artefact is actually about the process; just like the critical review itself. I had originally been thinking about doing the artefact as a leaflet/booklet, which I thought would be a good way to show my findings, but after understanding that it is in fact the process I decided to reevaluate my approach. I thought a video artefact would best appeal to my professional community, so I did a mind map of my ideas together a

Adesola Jessica Eleanor Henry Alexandra I couldn't quite hear Adesola at the start of the call, but I assumed we were talking about the Artefact, however this wasn't the case and we were (I think) talking about the critical review. Eleanor gave an overview as this was something they spoke about during a campus session. It is an... An account of your journey of your inquiry What is it we've done as if someone has no idea what we have been doing. Clear and accessible What we have gained and keep it in line with ethics and critical thinking. Analyse and crucially reflect on journey and experience. What it indicated to you and how it is relevant to my practice Artefact  A way you tell ideas through something different than an academic essay. Familiar to your practice, something people in your practice are used to engaging with. It isn't the result of your inquiry, it doesn't just tell the result, it tells the journey. Condensed summary of m

This was a great opportunity to talk through my ideas, that until now I had only been thinking in my own head, or writing down in my blog, journal or in my online SIGs. By speaking through these with Helen, I feel like this helped me gain clarity about what I am doing and the reasons behind it. Helen answered a few my questions and cleared up any uncertainties I had been having. As I have been writing the Critical Review in parts for a while now, despite not having collected all my data I tended to keep switching between past, present and future tense. I need to go back once i have completely finished to ensure it is all wrote at that time, so I am looking back on my processes and what I have found. At the moment my data isn't drawing any conclusions, it is simply showing me that everyone is their own person, everyone is individual, and what works for one person may not work for the other. I need to think about how this has shifted my thinking from when I started the inquiry.

I have jus returned from a week away in Mexico, which meant I took a break from BAPP work. Before the holiday I was worried about being a way right in the middle of my inquiry and had a sense of guilt and a little anxiety about it. Th first book I read whilst relaxing on the beach was 'Happy' by Fearne Cotton - a sort of autobiography/self-help book. This book helped to ease the feelings of panic and guilt and made me realise the importance of taking step back sometimes, especially seeing as I felt as though I came to a bit of a standstill before I left.  The time away from my inquiry left me with lots of time to reflect and to see things clearer and to realise what the important things are. Now I have returned home I feel recharged and ready to tackle the inquiry with a new lease of life.